First Sunday in Advent
Sunday, November 30, 2003
Saturday, November 29, 2003
Studying Religion
Okay, I admit, one reason I linked the article is because it quotes one of my professors, Chris Smith, who is a kick-butt sociologist of religion.
Friday, November 28, 2003
On Technology
Now, on the other hand, when I called the people at Netgear, I waited about 10 minutes to talk to someone. Then the person with whom I was talking couldn't understand me enough to take down my email address (why Netgear wanted my name, phone number, email, etc... I don't know), and had poor standard American English diction. It was impossible. She had me restarting (read: unplugging and plugging in) both my cable modem and wireless router OVER and OVER and OVER again. Finally, about 50 minutes later, she had me reset my router. This finally worked. The cable modem was working fine without the router, but when I plugged the router back in, it couldn't detect the internet nor my IP address. Resetting the router seemed to make it work.
However, that only worked for about 30 minutes. At that point, I cleared all my wireless settings on my laptop, re-did them, and now it works.
Shesh ... this is beginning to drive me crazy. That and after resetting my router, I have four new authentication codes to write down. Grr...
A Comment That Turned Into A Post
I was about to write this as a comment on Brian's blog, but I figured it was way too long. You should perhaps read his post on Newman first.
It seems that we are stumbling down the same path.
Have you considered what constitutes "The Church"? Rome claims it is behind a city and office, Constantinople claims the history and unity of Bishops, Cantebury claims ... well, Cantebury, and Protestants claim Doctrine.
Frankly, I see the points in all. I also see Newman's point. I do hold to a, sort of, prima scriptura where I take the reading of the Scriptures and the majority tradition of Church History.
However, this question of what defines "The Church" is a sticky one. Perhaps it is simply a philosophical question from the viewpoint of a linguist. What makes a true "American". One residing within these borders recognized by the US gov't, or someone who truly holds to the ideals and foundations of this nation. I think there are some in the former group who are not in the latter, vise versa, and some who are in both ... i.e., three camps.
I really haven't reconciled this. I don't think that I could walk from the fellowship of Redeemer (that is, the church or any of her plants should we move closer to one: I do hold to a parish view) in we were to stay in Austin, but when I come to the thought of moving, I'm frightened.
Do I seek to find a church which is "biblical" (what does that mean?) Where I and my family can hear the gospel preached and commune with God? Where I can serve and be served?
Thursday, November 27, 2003
Technological Revolution
Tuesday, November 25, 2003
A Couple of Thoughts
Oh yeah, Central Market is great. Today, Kristen picked up some San Francisco Blend coffee. Make a cup in the french press, add a little milk, sugar, and caramel, and you're good to go!
2. Drinking said coffee too late at night, will keep you up all night ... and spawn weird, drawn out, and random posts.
Monday, November 24, 2003
The Benefits of Being a Teacher
Will The Real Bush Please Stand Up?
US President George Bush is "totally at odds" with his media image, Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman Menzies Campbell said today.Maybe, just perhaps, some Americans could rethink their opinion of our president? Maybe a particular Lutheran wife who feels called to the ministry of reconciliation? Just a thought.
Mr Campbell, an opponent of the war with Iraq, spoke out on the ePolitix website about his discussions with the President during the state visit.
He said that they discussed directly issues such as Iraq, the Middle East, Guantanamo Bay, Kyoto and trade sanctions.
"He is personally extremely engaging. He has a well-developed sense of humour, is self-deprecating and when he engages in a discussion with you he is warm and concentrates directly on you.
"He looks you straight in the eye and tells you exactly what he thinks."
Mr Campbell, stressing that the President was "totally at odds" with his media image, went on: "I was not persuaded by what he said, but I was most certainly surprised at the extent to which the caricature of him was inaccurate.'
Could America's Monolingualism Be Our Problem
What do you call someone who knows three languages: trilingualWell, it the midst of reading an article about this Pro-9/11 toy being sold on the streets of Gaza and Ramallah, I noticed an interesting comment: [T]he attacks ... were seen as a victory for Palestinians. Oddly enough, Palestinian spokesmen deny this (in English). But Palestinian media (in Arabic) says otherwise. Perhaps if we took the time to learn foreign languages, particularly those used by our enemies, we'd be better off. However, this usually isn't a popular tactic. Go to any academic German department, read the history of their department. It will always talk about the department closing down during WWII because we didn't want German taught in American schools. What a stupid response.
What do you call someone who knows two languages: bilingual
What do you call someone who knows one language: an American
Sunday, November 23, 2003
Sabbath Reflection
"Lo! He comes with clouds descending,
Once for favored sinners slain;
Thousand thousand saints attending,
Swell the triumph of His train:
Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah!
God appears on earth to reign.
Every eye shall now behold Him
Robed in dreadful majesty;
Those who set at naught and sold Him,
Pierced and nailed Him to the tree,
Deeply wailing, deeply wailing, deeply wailing,
Shall the true Messiah see.
The dear tokens of His passion
Still His dazzling body bears;
Cause of endless exultation
To His ransomed worshippers;
With what rapture, with what rapture, with what rapture
Gaze we on those glorious scars!
Yea, Amen! let all adore Thee,
High on Thine eternal throne;
Savior, take the power and glory,
Claim the kingdom for Thine own;
Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah!
Everlasting God, come down!"
Saturday, November 22, 2003
I'm a "Southern Girl," as Rick would say
Friday, November 21, 2003
Font Boredom
Thursday, November 20, 2003
Marriage: "Civil Rights of Man" ?
Sosa's MVP goes to Pujols, not Bonds
SANTO DOMINGO, Dominican Republic -- If Sammy Sosa had a vote for the NL MVP, he would've picked Albert Pujols over Barry Bonds.
"Bonds had good numbers and has a name in the game, but Pujols deserved the award more than anybody," the Chicago Cubs star told The Associated Press on Wednesday night after returning home to the Dominican Republic.
Bonds got 28 of 32 first-place votes and 426 total points from the Baseball Writers' Association of America in results announced Tuesday.
Bonds hit .341 with 45 home runs and 90 RBI. The San Francisco outfielder became the only player to win three consecutive MVP awards, winning his sixth overall.
Pujols finished second, receiving three first-place votes and 303 total points.
The St. Louis slugger's .359 average led the majors and he had 43 home runs and 124 RBI. Sosa said his countryman's accomplishments overshadowed those of Bonds and others.
"No player in the National League stood out more than Pujols in 2003," Sosa said.
This homecoming is special for Sosa because baseball commissioner Bud Selig and other Cubs players will hold a celebration Saturday to honor Sosa for becoming the first Hispanic player to reach 500 homers.
Sosa, who turned 35 on Nov. 12, hit 40 homers this year. His total of 539 puts him 10th on the career list.
What a load of crock. Okay, Cork-ey. Sure Pujols had a better BA than Bonds, but his homers were fewer. As for the RBI's, well, let's see Pujols RBIs number when pitchers stop pitching to him. Bonds is the most feared player in the game. Bonds also carried an entire team, which was supposed to be in a "reloading" year after their WS lost. The Cardinals were supposed to be "kickin' butt and takin' names." In the end, it looks like the Cards were kickin' their own and looking for names of new players.
Like him or hate him, when the game is on the line, you either want him on your team ... or you walk him. Now that is valuable.
Wednesday, November 19, 2003
Linux
However, other than the DVD, does anyone have any praise or condemnation of Linux?
Hell Freezes over at Wheaton College
Tuesday, November 18, 2003
Class Notes
Saturday, November 15, 2003
Church Greeters
But, I think I figured out why it feels odd. A church is supposed to be a family, going to church should be like going home, it should be homey. Back in the day, there were butlers and maids to greet you, take your coat, offer you a drink, etc.. Nowadays, we don't have that. You go to a good friend's house and sometimes you don't even have to knock. You can simply walk it, pour yourself a glass of wine, and join the group. That's how it was for Kristen in North Carolina, that is how it is in our Home Fellowship Group. Bill has often looked at me and said, "Now Mike, I'm not going to ask you anymore." After a few seconds of thinking, I realized he was talking about the wine. I was now a part of the group. I wasn't a guest, I could take wine at my leisure and not wait to be served.
We don't have greeters in our homes anymore. You find greeters in Wal-Mart ... that's why it felt weird to me in church.
B.T.A. and George Grant
Well, I remembered Dr. Grant blogging that his good friend was the dean at the school, so I decided to check it out. Upon looking at the "Welcome from the Dean", the source of their friendship became clear. They must be members of the B.T.A. -- Bow Tie Association. Actually the picture of Dean Green is pretty good, which makes two guys who can pull off the bow tie.
Friends
Friday, November 14, 2003
CBN?
Will someone, who does have a T.V., please enlighten me about CBN. They aren't necessarily heretics like those at TBN, right? Are they wacky, extremely Zionist, dispensational, Christian fundamentalists?
Wednesday, November 12, 2003
GRE
The third test, the analytical writing, I had no idea about. I felt pretty good about it, but then again two summers ago I felt good about my Const.Law papers, and my TA's felt differently. The Analytical sections used to be something similar to the games section on the LSAT. I suppose they want to measure you're ability to analyze -- hence the name. Now, they have turned it into two essays, of which the prompts I cannot tell as I signed a statement saying so. However, one takes the form of a one-line statement:
Example: Augustine was a fricken genius and the Catholics and Orthodox need to take him more seriously.
At which point, you would need to write an essay taking some sort of position, supporting it, answering potential counter-arguments, etc...
In the second essay, you are presented with an argument of about two or three paragraphs. It usually has something to do with graduate school, being a graduate school exam. Here you are to critic the argument, take note of strong and weak points, evaluate the logic.
Both of these essays are out of 6 points. If you download the PowerPrep software the ETS gives you, they have a section with examples of each type of paper, from 0 (poor) to 6 (highest). Then, the two scores are averaged. Since this requires real graders, you have to wait a few weeks to receive the scores. My arrived today. I received a perfect 6.0, scoring the 95th percentile. This made me feel A LOT better. Like I actually got something out of the GRE, besides a humbling courtesy of the Verbal and Math sections.
Regarding Two Peter Leithart Posts
Obedience, Scripture says, is better than sacrifice. By analogy, moral purity is better than ritual purity. This analogy plays a big role in the gospels.
Then, I wonder, should those disgruntled with the ECUSA look past the ritual unpurity -- in their eyes -- of the Catholic Church in favor of Rome's moral purity -- or at least their willingless to call sin "sin" and do something about it?
Second, this post:
Jim Jordan suggests that Daniel 2-7, written in Aramaic, is a fulfillment of the promise/threat of tongues (from Isaiah), and that this passage authorizes translation of Scripture into various languages. Which leads to several thoughts:
1) As Jordan points out, translation was not done until the intertestamental period, and is still not done by Muslims. Refusal to translate seems to be particularly connected with old world/old covenant systems (like Islam). The written word is kept close, hidden away, but with the coming of the new covenant the written word is spread abroad in many languages. This fits with the characterization of the post-exilic period as an "ecumenical age," the age of the oikoumene.
2) The postmodern suspicion or critique of translation seems to be a reversion to a pre-Pentecostal mentality. For instance: The linguistic tribalism celebrated by Stanley Fish and other postmodern theorists. As I noted in an earlier post, Babel has become a dominant postmodern metaphor; which is to say, the reversal of Pentecost is a key postmodern theme. Social and linguistic fragmentation is inevitable when the Spirit withdraws, for the Spirit is the one who marries one to another.
For the first time, I think I'm in disagreement with Dr. Leithart, or maybe only Jordan. While I think that translations are permissable and perhaps helpful, I think that working from the original language is best and I do have grave suspicions about translations. When you work with a translation, you are interacting with a translator, not the text or original writer. The more I read of Paul's letters the more I think that most translations miss a tremendous amount. Even the "scholarly" NRSV is crap. In reading the Greek or Latin (for other church writers, e.g., Augustine), you can see the words which become weighty theological terms. Also, what authority does a translation have? In regards to Jordan's point of Daniel 2-7 being written in Aramaic, what's the point? And the NT was written in Greek ... ooh. Maybe this means we won't live Hebraic, covenantal lifestyles, but I don't see how a portions of scripture being written in different languages is a mandate for translations?
Tuesday, November 11, 2003
Blogging and Martin Luther
[speaking about the authority of elders]
Kristen: What if you posted something on your blog, something simple and true like "baptism means something." An elder reads it and tells you to take it down, what do you do?
John: You take it down.
Kristen: Even though it's true?
John: It's not that big of a deal, it's just your blog.
Ted: So, if you were Martin Luther, John, you would have recanted?
John: No, well... blogging is different than the 95 theses.
Ted: The door in Wittenberg and blogs? I don't see the difference.
Mike: Luther's blog was the door of Wittenberg?!
Monday, November 10, 2003
Poll
[Editorial Note: when she writes small, she should really say microscopic. ~Mike]
Sunday, November 09, 2003
Sabbath Reflection
The victory of life is won;
The song of triumph has begun:
Alleluia! Alleluia! Alleluia!
The powers of death have done their worst;
But Christ their legions hath dispersed;
Let shouts of holy joy outburst:
Alleluia! Alleluia! Alleluia!
The three sad days are quickly sped;
He rises glorious from the dead;
All glory to our risen Head!
Alleluia! Alleluia! Alleluia!
He closed the yawning gates of hell;
The bars from heaven's high portals fell;
Let hymns of praise His triumphs tell!
Alleluia! Alleluia! Alleluia!
Lord, by the stripes which wounded Thee,
From death's dread sting Thy servants free,
That we may live, and sing to Thee:
Alleluia! Alleluia! Alleluia!
Saturday, November 08, 2003
Our Apologies
We saw the Matrix Revolutions, Friday. It earned the bad reviews, though I still think people ought to go see it in the theatre... for closure. I think that the main "spiritual" thing I got out of it was that all the evangelicals who felt like the first Matrix was Christian are going to cry. And that all the W. bros did was steal the imagery of lots of different religions, strip them of their meaning, and try to make them Buddhist.
Wednesday, November 05, 2003
Potential for Greatness
Tuesday, November 04, 2003
Denis Haack on The Passion
Last month I was scheduled to lecture at The Art House in Nashville, the home and studio of Charlie and Andi Peacock. My flight arrived earlier than necessary so I could spend some time with them, but that was not to be. The young woman who met me at the airport flew down the highway, because she had to get me to The Art House in 30 minutes since that was when Mel Gibson's movie, The Passion, would be shown. He would be there to answer questions and solicit feedback on the film.
Yes, I did shake hands with Mel Gibson, and no, I do not usually have such experiences. And yes, I enjoyed it. Meeting Gibson, I mean. The Passion, in contrast, though a remarkable film, is not exactly enjoyable.
The copy we were shown is unfinished, but that isn't what I'm referring to. Gibson explained that editing still needed to be done. Some of the color needed retouching, the sound track was incomplete, and special effects had to be added. This actually made the viewing more enjoyable to me, since it was the first time I viewed a film before the final editing had been done.
Nor when I say it was not exactly enjoyable am I referring to the charge that The Passion is anti-Semitic. It is not.
Nor do I mean that it is not artful. On the contrary, The Passion sets a new standard for depictions of Christ in the arts. Only in the paintings of Ed Knippers have I experienced as powerful an artistic expression of the crucifixion.
The Passion is not exactly enjoyable because it so truthful about the cross.
The film opens with Jesus' arrest in the Garden, after wrestling in prayer over the task his Father has set before him. Like an unblinking eye, the camera forces us to watch, moment by agonizing moment, the torture Christ endured on our behalf. This is not the first flogging I have watched on the scree. The whipping that the character played by Denzel Washinton endured in Glory, for example, remains seared in my memory. But there the camera blinked. We saw a few lashes, and then to our relief the camera panned away. In The Passion the lashing went on, and on, the Roman soldiers wearing themselves out in the effort, and then on some more. LIke we were there.
I have warned more than once in these pages that Christians today tend to sentimentalize the faith. We brush over embarrassing parts of Scripture, and speak of the cost of salvation lightly. Sentimentalizing the gospel is to gut it of its power, its relevance, and its attractiveness. Before the final credits of The Passion rolled I was filled with a deep horror about how I have sentimentalized the cross and what my Savior went through so he could be my elder brother. It was hard to pay attention to the discussion that followed.
Mr Gibson said that his goal in making the film was to help people feel regret. "We don't feel enough regret," he said.
I can't speak for the others in The Art House that afternoon, but this is one reviewer for whom that goal was realized. And though it wasn't exactly enjoyable, I am more grateful than I can possibly express.
------------------
I've completely plagarized Denis' article. If he should read this and complain in an email, I'll take it down; however, I read and had to share it. I will add that Critique is not available by subscription, but you can be added to their mailing list. Donors are adding automatically. To receive Critique, send your mailing address to: Ransom Fellowship, 1150 West Center, Rochester, MN, 55902 Everyone on Ransom's mailing list also receives Notes From Toad Hall, which is Margie Haack's newsletter. I highly recommend both as they both benefit Kristen and I.
You can find more information at: http://www.ransomfellowship.org
Catholic - Orthodox relations
Apparently, they have come together to agree on filioque. I haven't taken the time to read it, but I did read the news report from Touchtone and the discussion between a Catholic and an Orthodox regarding the statement.
I will come clean and say that I really agree with the Orthodox on this. I really don't know whether the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son or just the Father. What I do know is that the original creed stated that the Holy Spirit came from the Father. I'm not too sure about the theological consequences of this decision is, but it is interesting nonetheless. However, I do agree with Fr. Reardon that there cannot be reunion between the two unless the Bishop of Rome wishes to acknowledge himself as "First among equals" as opposed to "First Above All, Only Vicar of Christ , et c."
Yet, we will see what becomes.
Sunday, November 02, 2003
View from Peniel
They Really Did It
If I was a Catholic priest, I'd start a major "bring Anglicans into Roman Catholicism" campaign using somewhat of the following: "We recognized our own sexual sin, we didn't turn away, we're dealing with it, not celebrating it." Something to that extent. Sin is rough, but we must deal with it as a church, come home to Rome. I do know of some who are leaving for Rome, but not I ... not yet.
So, what will I do? I'm not sure. I suppose I'll pray for the unity and purity of the Church, but I'm not too sure. I'm not too sure what I like or dislike about various traditions. I feel home with Rome, but I have issues. I have issues with all the major traditions, and I don't know what to think. Is this simply a tension that the Church must deal with until we are purified in heaven? Tertullian wrote that heresies are our punishment from the Fall, but I don't know that I necessarily consider all the other traditions as heresies. They are Christian, I think. I consider Wayne Olson a brother, just as JT or Daniel Silliman.
It is times like this that I feel really dumb and very small. But perhaps that is what I should feel, maybe that is the feeling the Church lost at different points and how we ended up in this mess. Maybe I should cast a similar vision as Dr. Garver's ecclesiastical vision: serve faithfully in my local church, visit the sick, etc ...
Then again, my sober thoughts could just be inspired by that torturous event last Tuesday known as ... GRE.
Saturday, November 01, 2003
Urban Living*
* This post is brought to you due to insomnia.